Skip to main content

The Swear Box


Somtimes, swearing is completely justified

It has been decided by members of the office in which I work that we will be installing a "swear box" into which we must put one English pound every time we are deemed to have used an expletive.

I won't be joining in. I love swearing. I refuse to acknowledge that it's offensive in every situation. It's all about context. It is possible to swear and not cause offence, as well as it being possible, shock horror, to cause offence even without swearing.

I wrote this blog entry a while ago, explaining how vehemently I disagree with trying to ban swearing, and my thoughts since that time have not changed one jot.

I don't see why swearing is so frowned upon when there are so many other more offensive things being said. I'm not even talking about purposefully aggressive or demeaning comments. I for one cannot abide anything said without being given the proper forethought. "Think before you speak" is a vital part of effective and accurate communication and it is in drastically short supply (the constant use of double-negatives is in itself enough to make me rethink the ban on handguns). Conversely, when used correctly, swearing adds great colour and variety to language that is otherwise tepid and stale, together with accentuating certain phrases, reactions and points of view in a way that is completely necessary. Any office that cannot find a place for the use of the incredibly descriptive "Omnifuck" (thank you, The Thick of Itis not one in which I wish to spend time. It's one of those words, like schadenfreude, that has no equal in its succinct descriptiveness.

Incidentally, watch The Thick of It and  then try to tell me that Malcolm Tucker is not some kind of artist.

The tone of conversation within an office environment is often one of muted frustration and anger, with no allowable outlet until each member of staff gets to go home and take out their day on their loved ones. This is mainly because it is still deemed wrong to shout at or punch virtual strangers with whom you happen to share oxygen for 8 hours each day. This could all be avoided with a subtle yet firm outcry of "For the love of jelly-flavoured cocksicles!" or "What in the name of swollen ball-sacks?!". Both glorious uses of the rich tapestry that is the English language, and great to let out frustration without telling anyone around you how you really feel about the hellish situation you currently find yourself in. What I'm saying is that the inevitable outcome of an office ban on swearing is a miserable home life and eventual divorce.

And that brings me to another thing. Who is to decide what is a curse word and what isn't? Should it be someone who doesn't swear or appreciate the use of such language? Should someone who finds all swearing in a specific environment be allowed to police that environment against that use of language? I, for instance, don't believe "cocksicles" or "ball-sacks" to be swearing. But I'm guessing the self-appointed foul-language constabulary, with their self-bestowed powers of language limitation to that deemed acceptable and do find it outrageous and fine-worthy.

They'll be telling me I can't say c*nt next.

See what I did there? I made you say it instead of me. I took no responsibility for my actions and made you the guilty party for thinking it instead. Your brain has to put £1 in the box. What a cunt.

I don't believe that swearing is big, or clever, or always necessary. But, like every other noise that comes out of the big hole in your face, if used with some thought, it can be worth hearing.

All I ask is that you think about it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Idiots on a Plane

I've been fortunate enough to have had a column published on gizmodo.co.uk. It can be found here: http://m.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/04/the-idiosyncrasies-and-character-flaws-flying-brings-out-in-me/ Many thanks to Kat Hannaford for throwing it on the front page.

My daughter knows me so well.

Last week, I was out with my daughter and some friends and my daughter decided to draw everyone's picture and give it to them as a present. Most of them were really, really good.  This was mine: I can't decide whether this is how she sees me and she thinks I should confess that I have messed a lot of things up, or whether she simply messed the drawing up.

Evolution makes me look like a dick

Over the course a billions of years, evolutionary biology has worked such that Humans are one of the only known mammals to ambulate in a bipedal fashion, which is to say we prefer, if at all possible, to trudge around using only two peds (pronounced "peeds", "ped" being the latin for "the end of your legs"). This gives us a feeling of massive superiority over all the other species, who have their faces close to the ground smelling who-knows-what, getting all of their limbs dirty. Meanwhile, we have our heads held high. That said, and I would never dream to question evolution, it's an absolute bastard to walk in the snow. The entire notion of bipedal motion (which sounds like a very poor Lil' Wayne lyric, I know), the balanced required, shifting weight from front to back, is all based on the idea that when you put one of your peds on the floor, it stays in the same spot where you put it. It doesn't move two inches forward, shifting your bod